Chorley and Smart leading cases in the law of banking

The jury found, however, that she did not so accept the payment. The defendant
bank contended that the plaintiff was entitled to nominal damages only, as she
had not pleaded special or actual damage. The jury awarded substantial
damages, however, in the sum of £50, and after they had then been discharged,
the court heard further argument regarding damages. Decision It was held that as
the plaintiff was a non-trader, who had not proved any special damage, she was
entitled to ...